OLD-HOUSE JOURNAL'S TRADITIONAL PRODUCTS Trademark Information

Trademark by CRUZ BAY PUBLISHING, INC.

Magazine serving the needs of people interested in information and advice about historically appropriate products made specifically for old houses and for new homes built in a traditional style

Classification Information

Use in Commerce Trademark - Applicant has provided proof of use of this mark in commerce to USPTO.

Primary Class: Class Details:
Class (016)
Paper, cardboard and goods made from these materials, not included in other classes; printed matter; bookbinding material; photographs; stationery; adhesives for stationery or household purposes; artists' materials; paint brushes; typewriters and office requisites (except furniture); instructional and teaching material (except apparatus); plastic materials for packaging (not included in other classes); printers' type; printing blocks.
First Use Anywhere:: 12/1/2003
First Use In Commerce: 12/1/2003
General Information
Word mark: OLD-HOUSE JOURNAL'S TRADITIONAL PRODUCTS
Status/Status Date:
CONTINUED USE NOT FILED WITHIN GRACE PERIOD, UN-REVIVABLE
10/12/2012
Serial Number: 78425742
Filing Date: 5/26/2004
Registration Number: 2989367
Registration Date: 8/30/2005
Goods and Services: Magazine serving the needs of people interested in information and advice about historically appropriate products made specifically for old houses and for new homes built in a traditional style
Mark Description: NOT AVAILABLE
Type Of Mark: TradeMark
Published For Opposition Date: 6/7/2005
Last Applicant/Owner:
CRUZ BAY PUBLISHING, INC.
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
Mark Drawing Code: Standard Character Mark
Design Search:
(NO DATA)
Register Type: Principal
Disclaimer: ("Traditional Products")
Correspondent:
BONNER KIERNAN TREBACH & CROCIATA
1250 EYE ST NW STE 600
WASHINGTON DC 20005-5930
Current Status:
CONTINUED USE NOT FILED WITHIN GRACE PERIOD, UN-REVIVABLE
10/12/2012
Correspondent Search:
JOHN D. MASON is a correspondent of OLD-HOUSE JOURNAL'S TRADITIONAL PRODUCTS trademark.
Current Overall Rating:
RatingRatingRatingRatingRating

(0 review)

As seen on